Prev | Pause | Next

-Select School- CCSU Fairleigh Dickinson Long Island Monmouth Mount St. Mary's Quinnipiac Robert Morris Sacred Heart St. Francis (NY) St. Francis (PA) Wagner Bryant -Associate Members- -Bowling- -------------- Adelphi Kutztown Saint Peter's -Football- -------------- Albany Duquesne -Field Hockey- -------------- Lock Haven Rider Siena

- Select Sport - - Fall Sports - - Football -       Team by Team       Composite - Field Hockey -       Team by Team       Composite - Men's Soccer -       Team by Team       Composite - Women's Soccer -       Team by Team       Composite - Volleyball -       Team by Team       Composite - Winter Sports - - Men's Basketball -       Team by Team       Composite - Women's Basketball -       Team by Team       Composite - Spring Sports - - Baseball -       Team by Team       Composite - Softball -       Team by Team       Composite - Lacrosse -       Team by Team       Composite

	Name: Email:

NEC Tiebreakers (updated 4/26)

Long Island has clinched the #1 seed in the NEC Tournament.
Monmouth and Sacred Heart have also clinched NEC playoff berths.
Robert Morris and Quinnipiac are alive for the final spot in the four-team tournament.

Robert Morris and Quinnipiac still must make up their doubleheader that was postponed earlier in the season.

If RMU sweeps, then RMU is #2, SHU is #3 and MU is #4.
If QU sweeps, then SHU is #2, MU is #3 and QU is #4.
If the teams split, then SHU is #2, RMU is #3 and MU is #4.


NEC Softball Tiebreaker Policy:

Two-Way Tiebreaker
In the event of a two-way tie in the standings, the following tiebreaker system shall be used – in order – until the tie is broken:

1. Winning percentage of each team in head-to-head competition.

2. Winning percentage of each team vs. the first-place team, or their composite winning percentage against any teams tying for first place.

3. Winning percentage of each team vs. the second-place team, or their composite winning percentage against any teams tying for second place.

4. This process continues with winning percentage vs. the third-place team, fourth-place team, etc., as necessary, until the tie is broken and seeding is complete.

5. If a tie still exists after exhausting steps 1-4, the team allowing the fewest runs in Conference games shall be seeded highest.

6. If a tie still exists after exhausting steps 1-5, the team with the best run differential in Conference games (with a maximum count of five runs per game) shall be seeded highest.

Three-Way (or more) Tiebreaker
In the event of a three-way tie (or a tie involving more than three teams) in the standings, the  following tiebreaker system shall be used in the order listed.

1. The winning percentages of the teams involved in the tie vs. each other shall be compared. If one team’s winning percentage is superior to the others, that team shall be removed from the tie and seeded highest of the teams involved in the tie. If two teams subsequently remain, that tie shall be broken utilizing the two-way tiebreaker procedure.

2. If no single team has a superior winning percentage after the comparison described in No. 1, but multiple teams have the same superior percentage to the any other teams involved in the tie, those teams with the superior percentage will be compared using either the two-way or three-way tiebreaker procedure. The team that has the advantage will be seeded highest of all teams involved in the original tie. The other team(s) (the loser(s) of the appropriate tiebreaker) will again be compared to the remaining teams in the tie, beginning with step No. 1 of the three-way tiebreaker.

3. If all winning percentages in the three-way (or more) tie vs. teams involved in the tie are the same, each team’s winning percentage vs. the first-place team or teams tying for first place shall be compared. If one team’s winning percentage is superior to the others, that team shall be removed from the tie and seeded highest of the teams involved in the tie. If two teams remain, that tie shall be broken utilizing the two-way tiebreaker procedure.

4. If all winning percentages in the three-way (or more) tie vs. teams involved in the tie are the same, each team’s winning percentage vs. the first-place team or teams tying for first place shall be compared. If multiple teams have a superior winning percentage to any other team in the original tie, those teams with the superior percentage will be compared using either the two-way or three-way tiebreaker procedure. The team that has the advantage will be seeded highest of all teams involved in the original tie. The other team(s) (the loser(s) of the appropriate tiebreaker) will again be compared to the remaining teams in the tie, beginning with step No. 1 of the two-way or three-way tiebreaker.

5. This process continues as necessary, comparing winning percentages of teams in the tie vs. the second-place team or their composite percentages vs. teams tying for second place, third place, etc., until all ties are broken and seeding is complete.

6. If a tie still exists after exhausting all previous steps, the team allowing the fewest runs in Conference games shall be seeded highest. If two teams remain, that tie shall be broken utilizing the two-way tiebreaker procedure.

7. If a tie still exists after exhausting all previous steps, the team with the best run differential in Conference games (with a maximum count of five runs per game) shall be seeded highest. If two teams remain, that tie shall be broken utilizing the two-way tiebreaker procedure.